How can a guy
get slapped for speaking in Hindi and not Tamil ? asks a twitterati. Film
companion South YouTube channel film critic Baradwaj Rangan says Jai Bhim is badly
made film . Has 1.59, 850 views and 12 K
have disliked while others have liked it.
Let’s us
take scene where IG interrogates a pawn broker who accepted the stolen jewels.
Pawn broker says in Hindi that since the guys were from the same area and
before he completes it, Prakashraj who plays IG slaps him. Pawn broker asks why
did you slap me and he gets the reply- Speak in Tamil.
So what is
wrong in it asks twiterrati. Is it not
an Indian language ? Another goes a step forward and points out that Prakashraj
being a Kannadiga should be slapped for speaking in various languages on
screen.
Now those disliking
Rangan’s review of Jai Bhim attributes caste prejudice, not knowing reality and
pointing out reviews where he praised actors who were stone faced and being not able to digest somebody being
better than Mani Rathinam ( Rangan wrote
a book on Mani).
Rangan has
this disclaimer at the start - having a good story and good intentions
automatically do not make a good movie and if you are a fan of Samudrakanni the
director then you are going to like the film. The review is for those who do
not belong to this category says Rangan.
Wonder why
Rangan brought Samudrakanni in to it ?.At times, Suriya does sound like Kanni.
It was only recently that Kanni informed that he was going to say no to the
preachy kind of roles. Probably those who hated Samudrakanni decided to hear
out Rangan.
Now the
comments are that Baradwaj praised Malayalam
film Brahmam and rated Mamata Mohandas performance to be so good that one
forgot Tabu’s in the original. Rangan
terms Suriya not being involved and being in a hurry. He says a similar subject of
three people going missing ( Naayattu) was handled well by a neighboring State
( Kerala) with finesse and is it too
much to expect such from Tamil audience and go on to magnify everything. I
gathered from the whole review is that he did not like the police brutality
overuse, magnifying of scenes and characters and lack of giving a personal dimension
to the Lawyer character. In short, he says this not an iconic movie.
Most of his
reviews or rather 99% of it never calls
a spade a spade directly and describes it many ways. I have found him to go
great lengths to find some `positives’ in a bad film. The majority of his core
viewers seem to have liked what he spoke
about the film and so he knows his audience well. As for Nayattu- it did not
happen in a environment like in Jai Bhim. I gathered from the scenes in he film
that Lawyer Chandru is a painter and he
reads Economic and Political Weekly.
Mercifully, Chandru is not a tribal song writer cum singer and the
teacher ( Rajisha ) a chorus singer.